Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gautama Buddha (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:52, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gautama Buddha (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A film (with no intext citations) that fails both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. Peace be with Gautama Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 13:11, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~. I'm unable to find sources that would confirm this film's notability. That said, there might be some non-english sources out there that would prove me wrong, and I'd be happy to Keep if that ends up being the case. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 18:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep with the new sourcing. There's still work to do, but it's clearly notable now. Good work. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 16:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nominator and Ultraexactzz. Keep since sources have been added and article has been improved. Torreslfchero (talk) 13:29, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Keep and let's improve it. Sorry Bonkers... this unsourced article is not unsourcable, as shortening the title and including the director's name has given us a few articles and reviews.[1] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 00:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC) (STRUCK my "weak" per ongoing improvements) Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.}[reply]
Its okay,now I'm starting to see the "notable" aspect of this film. It needs some cleanup and decent sourcing still. Cheers. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 05:19, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.