Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Chaudhary (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 00:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Chaudhary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails Wikipidea's notability guidelines possibly a coiBenin antidota (talk) 22:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC) Benin antidota (talk) 22:30, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - noting for participants that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Chaudhary (which resulted in a consensus to delete) concerned a different individual. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Chaudhary (2nd nomination) did concern this individual and resulted in a no consensus outcome. SamHolt6 (talk) 22:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - subject meets WP:GNG and WP:BIO due to the subject accruing significant, sustained coverage in WP:RS. Coverage includes Chaudhary and his channel (Technical Guruji) being cited in a 2017 article by the head of YouTube India as an example of Hindi-language YouTube channels in India, and recent articles about Chaudhary being published in India Times,The Hindustan Times, and in Forbes India (written by Forbes staff, not a contributor), the latter of which listed Chaudhary as being one of Forbes India's 30 under 30. Many more sources can be found online (by searching for Chaudhary or Technical Guruji), strongly implying the notability of this inidivudal. SamHolt6 (talk) 22:48, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Per rationale by SamHolt6. I can see subject discussed in reliable sources. Celestina007 (talk) 22:50, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per arguments above. Balle010 (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per WP:GNG. The subject is notable. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:54, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The above sources are notable Spudlace (talk) 06:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.