Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary T. Poole
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:16, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gary T. Poole[edit]
- Gary T. Poole (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Prod was removed by an IP claiming to be the subject. The-Pope (talk) 15:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:27, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I left the following at the IP talk page: "Do you have sources (things other people wrote about you) which establish what is said in the article? If so, you should say so soon as that is relevant to the deletion discussion." Ability to establish is likely if what the article says is true, and suitable sources would resolve both establishability and establishment. North8000 (talk) 17:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I didn't see any notable links on Google and Yahoo.SwisterTwister talk 04:18, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination.--Milowent • talkblp-r 14:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.