Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Ng

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete per criteria G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion Nick-D (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Ng[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I previously added a PROD to this article. The PROD was promptly removed by the article creator, who provided the following rationale on my talk page:

"I saw you placed Notability and Deletion tag on the article. It appears you have not gone through the references! If a detailed coverage in Daily Telegraph and BBC doesn't establishes Notability I don't know what else does. Anyway if you still have "issues" with the content discuss it on talk-page, Reinstating those tags will force me to consult an admin and ask him whether or not the article is Notable or not. Good luck."

Per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), that the subject has received coverage in two reliable sources does not necessarily confer notability. The subject has not received wide-ranging coverage in secondary sources as required. The coverage is not particularly "detailed". Google results are very sparse and dominated by self-published and promotional stuff.

Furthermore, the article creator is a single-purpose account and the article is written in a promotional tone of voice. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. Citobun (talk) 10:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 11:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 11:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

strong delete probable AUTOBIO . Created suspiciously by single purpose editor and only claim to fame is being CEO of a non notable company. LibStar (talk) 14:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing particularly better. SwisterTwister talk 20:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.