Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Goh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move to Draft:Gary Goh, as requested by the article creator. bd2412 T 02:10, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Goh[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is a lot of puffery in this article, and I'm not certain any of the references constitute significant coverage in independent sources. The books appear self-published. The universities look dodgy. There would be hundreds of justices of the peace in Queensland probably. Boneymau (talk) 04:50, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 04:51, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Negligible cites on GS. No pass of WP:Prof. Claims of various awards lack reliable sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Draftify. it is requested to draftify or userify the article at the moment so that i can incubate it and submit for review. i have multiple offline and online sources to prove the notability but i can not produce them within 4 days because i am busy in real life. i will add the sources for GNG and other requirements then submit the draft for review. thanks. Yanksbier (talk) 08:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.