Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary DeGrio

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 19:50, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gary DeGrio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 06:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  10:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  10:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He played for the US at the 1982 IIHF World Championship. This is verified by USA Hockey [1]. Deadman137 (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Did he actually play or was he just on the roster? I personally find it very odd that to some editors playing in no games means failing notability, but stepping on the ice for 3 second in a game makes someone magically notable. That being said, I still think its a question worth asking (and finding the answer to) since otherwise he had fairly unremarkable and short minor league career. RonSigPi (talk) 04:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
He played in 7 games recording 4 points on what was a very terrible team. Deadman137 (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If Alon Eizenman is allowed to have an article with what little credentials he has, then this guy is easily more qualified. I will admit that finding articles on this player is not the simplest task just because of how long ago he played, though finding NHL articles from the 80s can be difficult enough at times. Deadman137 (talk) 23:18, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is evidence cited in his article that Eizeman skated for Israel (scoring the game-tying goal vs. Australia in the 2014 IIHF World Championship Division II), thus meeting WP:NHOCKEY. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid argument; each article is assessed on its own value. If you wish to debate whether Alon Eizenman is notable, this is not the place to do it. I've made my assessment of Mr. DeGrio's career, and you have made yours. — Jkudlick tcs 22:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually this is a more than fair comparison based on the careers of the two players. Also passing WP:NHOCKEY under criterion #6 requires a player to play at the top division championship level as Mr. DeGrio did, not Division II as you claim. The main difference between the two players is that one played in an era where the internet existed, making it easy to find articles where they are mentioned and the other did not. Deadman137 (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Criterion #6 states "[p]layed on a senior national team (such as at the Olympic Games or World Championship)," but it doesn't specifically state that it has to be the top division of the World Championship. If that is to be required, then it should be explicitly denoted. Eizenman played on the Israel senior national team, just in Division II due to the way IIHF organizes its world championships. — Jkudlick tcs 02:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 04:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.