Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garvita Sadhwani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:26, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Garvita Sadhwani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. The article has no substancial work, awards, roles aur sources to pass WP:GNG Sssaaraa (talk) 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2023 August 21. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. Skynxnex (talk) 19:06, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not only are none of these sources independent, they're all about a single thing: that makeup for this role took three hours. Extremely trivial. -- asilvering (talk) 21:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No independent reliable source available supporting notability; clearly fails GNG. Ekdalian (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.