Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garth Barraclough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Garth Barraclough[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A person from Newington College who was on some company boards Adsfvdf54gbb (talk) 11:48, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 December 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:13, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:07, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the sourcing goes against our guidelines on reliable sources. Who's Who is especially depricated. It is basically Linkedin when it was a little more restrictive in inclusion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot find anything to support notability. Aoziwe (talk) 21:38, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would have thought his roles would be notable (there's also some reference in Google to him being the president of The Smith Family (charity)) but Google turns up nothing useful. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Almost complete lack of sources to go on. Frickeg (talk) 10:57, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.