Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garret Kramer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as per author's request. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Garret Kramer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non no0table; being quotes in interviews shows a desire for promotion, not notability, and there are no other third party sources. DGG ( talk ) 21:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. At first glance, the list of references looked impressive, but all of them were either primary, unrelated, or trivial. Nothing here to establish notability. As for the references I found on Google News, none of the Google summaries sound promising. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pleased delete the article! Steveswei 00:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveswei (talk • contribs)

Delete As stated above, the references are very weak. Notability is not achieved. Stormbay (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - User:Steveswei, the only substantive author of the article, has requested deletion both here and on his talk page. This meets a speedy delete criteria. I'm not on a machine where I can easily mark a page for speedy deletion; could someone else take care of this? --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.