Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garnet Patterson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per comments here and at the DRV, the original "no consensus defaulting to delete" close is overturned, and I am closing this case as a standard "delete". ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  01:10, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garnet Patterson[edit]

Garnet Patterson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

possible autobiography Kges1901 (talk) 11:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak delete while I found these references - [1], [2], [3]. The majority of the articles are just mentions of him and not any real significant coverage, so fails WP:GNG. Also, the article's creator is "Patterson2929" is a little fishy and maybe COI. LADY LOTUSTALK 13:45, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 16:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Front running Australian Formula 3 driver - recognised by the FIA as a contributing series to Superlicence qualification[4]. A series previously established as being notable. Some other coverage[5]. --Falcadore (talk) 17:23, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Doesn't have the coverage required to meet WP:GNG. All of the sources either are passing mentions (routine sports reporting) or don't mention him at all.204.126.132.231 (talk) 21:26, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:57, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.