Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garma Festival of Traditional Cultures
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:03, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Garma Festival of Traditional Cultures[edit]
- Garma Festival of Traditional Cultures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. a non notable festival. one hit in gnews [1] LibStar (talk) 03:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The fact that it's a hopeless one-line stub doesn't negate the 3 reliable sources already cited on the page. Possibly move to Garma Festival. "...of Traditional Cultures" is just boilerplate PC pap, and more pertinently, all the refs call it simply "Garma Festival".--Yeti Hunter (talk) 15:34, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The ABC source already in the article goes a long way towards establishing notability, and searching for just "Garma Festival", as suggested by Yeti Hunter, finds plenty more such sources: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:27, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, independent coverage and awards push this over the notability line in my view. Lankiveil (speak to me) 00:25, 27 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- Keep clearly notable, although article needs work. Orderinchaos 10:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.