Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garfish Restaurants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Garfish Restaurants[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:CORP. the gnews hits are mainly about stories on how it employs foreign workers. the awards including from local newspaper hardly establish notability. LibStar (talk) 05:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of significant coverage, doesn't pass WP:CORP. Ajf773 (talk) 08:55, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 13:23, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The awards listed and mentioned elsewhere are not notable in themselves and I am seeing nothing to indicate more than a company going about its business. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:19, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 17:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.