Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garey Hayden

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 05:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Garey Hayden[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable possibly per WP:BLP1E. Article has zero content with only a single non-third-party source. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 00:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - This is laughable. Deleting Hayden from contract bridge would be like deleting Gary Player from golf. Articles need some time to develop. Abuse of nominations for deletion is why some people leave Wikipedia editing. Please give me a friggin' break! What a waste of time to have to respond to such crap! Additional material and references have been added since the delete tag was placed. Article deletion is not warranted. Newwhist (talk) 03:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A winner of multiple major championships at the highest level. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:59, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.