Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gareth Ward

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, nomination withdrawn by nominator. -- Longhair 14:10, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Ward[edit]

This text should be deleted because it fails the Verifiability test all the way through. It could also be considered a Vanity page, written mostly by the one author at IP 210.89.145.217, which happens to be based in [1] Wollongong. I would vote it a strong delete schgooda 16:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC) Thanks for the clean-up Capitalistroadster, it's certainly an improvement on the verifiability of the article. Neutral[reply]

Comment: -- Is this a withdrawal of your nomination for deletion? - Longhair 12:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:: On further reflection, I must admit it is a withdrawal of nomination, but does the closing admin have to make a judgement on this page, or is there somthing I must do?--schgooda 14:06, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: -- Nothing to do. I've closed the debate. - Longhair 14:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

schgooda 16:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. After a thorough exploration of references, Neutral -- Grafikm_fr 10:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I have rewritten the article based on verifiable media sources. It seems that Ward has attracted a reasonable amount of coverage with 46 returns in an Australia New Zealand database. It is a matter for judgement as to whether council members meet WP:BIO but amount of verifiable material should be one of the important factors.Capitalistroadster 02:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 02:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC).Capitalistroadster 02:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Capitalistroadster. -- Synapse 06:45, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Longhair 12:48, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.