Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardener (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Elders of the Universe. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gardener (comics)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character TTN (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - zero real world notability. Just another minor comic character.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable character being covered in detail in sources such as this and that. Andrew D. (talk) 17:57, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Completely irrelevant in-universe descriptions that lack any commentary on the character. TTN (talk) 18:08, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Davidson: Please change your !vote to "redirect" and/or "merge" -- those sources do not prove the independent notability of this extremely minor character -- in fact they support the assertion that he isn't independently notable. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Elders of the Universe. That article at least has some sources, and I've frankly never heard this character being referred to outside that context in any secondary or tertiary sources. Andrew's sources support this assertion. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:35, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew Davidson, or merge to Elders of the Universe. BOZ (talk) 03:52, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Elders of the Universe - There is not enough coverage in reliable secondary sources to support an independent article, and the character is already sufficiently covered at the target article. Rorshacma (talk) 05:38, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above Argento Surfer (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Few paragraphs in CBR, mostly summarizing character fictional history and such, are not sufficient for this to pass WP:NFICTION. No discussion of his significance in literature, impact on real world, etc. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.