Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garden real estate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -Docg 01:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Garden real estate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
Please keep in mind while reading this that I can always be swayed in my opinions. This article does not site its sources (WP:V). It reads close to the edge of an advert, and I suspect it may have been planted to support a company. From looking at the first couple pages of ghits, of which there are many, it looks like they aren't for this exact phrase, they're for some combination of "home and garden" and "real estate". I suspect that "Garden real estate" may be a non-notable neologism. Delete. If someone can make this into a real sourced article which makes sense, I'm always willing to rescind my nomination. Mak (talk) 00:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It doesn't read like an advert, and certainly doesn't seem to be promoting a company - but it looks a whole lot like an essay. --Dennisthe2 00:56, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Let us not be coy.This is an out-and-out blatant essay. Exterminate.--Anthony.bradbury 01:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete though content disputes are usually not AfD material it does not strike me as encyclopedic in tone at all. Seems like a lot of OR in my opinion.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in the absence of anything to indicate that this is actually a notable subset of real estate. JCO312 14:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. P.B. Pilhet / Talk 17:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - looks like OR, no sources listed. Tony Fox (arf!) 21:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like an essay. Honbicot 22:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. RFerreira 10:59, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.