Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gar Waterman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The source analysis is pretty convincing so I'm closing this as Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gar Waterman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a local artist created by a now banned editor who acknowledged a WP:COI with the subject. Does not appear to meet WP:ARTIST and a WP:BEFORE search does not appear to show any WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG Melcous (talk) 23:35, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Connecticut, Maine, and New Jersey. WCQuidditch 04:16, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep I found some more recent information, including a very long article in the New Haven Independent which has info that should be added to the article. (I did some minor additions and included this as a reference.) I also found that he has a piece permanently in the Hood Museum of Art at Dartmouth. Since the notability criteron is stated as a plural ("been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums") this probably falls short. I have read in informal accounts that he had a major exhibit at Yale's Peabody museum but haven't nailed that down. In G-Books there are gallery guides that show that he had exhibits but these are mere listings of times and places Lamona (talk) 05:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]
  • Comment - I updated the expired 404 citations with archives and I think there might be a possibility he's notable. Once I go thru the updated sources, will !vote. Not totally sure yet, as the first source is really about a hardware store, not him, the second source is about an open studio tour (with just a picture and mention of him.) The fifth source doesn't mention him at all, which is how far I got so far. Some of the reviews seem fine, however whether he meets GNG and the stricter NARTIST criteria to be determined. Netherzone (talk) 01:58, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment This article is ref bombed with sources that are just passing mentions. Multiple citations for the identity of his wife, 7 sources for the lede. Not a reason for deletion, but still the article needs some editing. Specifically bio info from his personal website The Hood Museum piece is a donation from the Dartmouth's Class of 1978 (his alma mater and class). --WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. A source analysis would be helpful at this point.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment table:
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://web.archive.org/web/20120910171916/http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2010/04/29/news/new_haven/doc4bd8f9b661725235986130.txt Yes Yes No article about hardware store No
https://web.archive.org/web/20101103022230/http://newhavenindependent.org/index.php/archives/entry/city-wide_open_studios_the_westville_renaissance/id_30327 Yes No blog post No local review of exhibition No
https://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/article/thrown_for_a_curve/ Yes No blog post No artilce about Gallery 195 No
https://www.nytimes.com/1997/04/27/realestate/for-1-the-best-little-warehouse-in-new-haven.html Yes Yes ? behind paywall ? Unknown
https://web.archive.org/web/20120910172028/http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2010/07/11/news/doc4c392b0a0f581383306064.txt Yes Yes No article about New Haven Arena No
https://web.archive.org/web/20120921233449/http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2002/sep/13/a-hidden-secret-in-subdued-westville/ Yes Yes No article about real estate and physical studio No
webarchive.loc.gov/all/20080918035854/http://www.newhavenindependent.org/archives/gone_dishin/ Yes No blog post No arts listing No
https://www.newhavenindependent.org/article/the_hands_of_gar_waterman Yes Yes Yes Yes
http://garwaterman.com/bio/ No No artist's own website No No
https://hoodmuseum.dartmouth.edu/news/2015/01/recent-acquisitions-gar-waterman-feral-seed Yes Yes Yes note of Hood Museum aquisition Yes
https://www.huinoeau.com/art-events/2023/1/talk-story-with-2023-artist-in-residence-gar-waterman No No No announcement of welcome party No
https://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/article/whalley_avenue_of_their_dreams/ Yes Yes No article about traffic flow on Whalley Avenue No
https://www.nytimes.com/1997/06/29/style/thea-buxbaum-gar-waterman.html Yes Yes No wedding annoucnment No
https://www.newhavenindependent.org/index.php/article/bza_to_rule_whether_bed_and_breakfast_is_inn_or_out/ Yes Yes No article about wife's B&B No
https://web.archive.org/web/20100726212850/http://www.naia.com.fj/post.php?stone-nudis-18 No No No call for photographs No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.
  • Delete - I was on the fence about this article, however the detailed source analysis by WomenArtistUpdates helped to clarify. It takes a long time to construct these, thanks for taking the time to do so. I can read the "unknown" source in the table, it's an article in the NYT real estate ("Habitat") section. It's in-depth, but it's about a warehouse he and his wife purchased. It's not an analytical/critical review of his work. Although he's been working for some time, I think it is still TOOSOON for an encyclopedia article. Netherzone (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.