Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ganaraskan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 21:16, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ganaraskan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No reliable, secondary sources found, so it fails to meet the notability guideline. Checked GSearch, GNews, GBooks, and the books I have print copies of (which do include new breeds). I appreciate that someone saw the page and wanted to try to save it, but sites like Suite101 that anyone can write for aren't acceptable, and the only source listed now seems to be the founder's website. You can read more about what constitutes a reliable source for Wikipedia's purposes here. Anna ^talk 18:56, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. Once the 'breed' has some notable, reliable references, then it would be wikipedia worthy. Keetanii (talk) 08:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The one reference which it cites explains that the breed originates from southern Ontario, but doesn't not provide references either: for all we know, it could be just made up.Curb Chain (talk) 09:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.