Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamma Entertainment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gamma Entertainment[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage, fails WP:NCORP. Störm (talk) 20:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Independent RS coverage does not satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. Citations in the article are a routine directory entry, incidental mentions, a promotional trade article and industry award fluff. An independent search for reliable secondary source coverage yielded almost nothing substantial. The best hit was a Stuff article that looks borderline routine. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Short stubby promotional oriented article and lacks notability or indication of general interest. Graywalls (talk) 09:12, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.