Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamm (record label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:47, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gamm (record label)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage per WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 02:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete more relevant than the nominator's rationale is the fact that this is a bootleg label with no notable artists signed to it. Certainly does not meet WP:MUSIC's sense of "one of the more important indie labels", and would not pass the GNG outside of that, so far as I can tell. Chubbles (talk) 03:32, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Chubbles. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 14:06, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - Little known underground labels which gain zero (or barely) significant coverage don't need articles. Foxnpichu (talk) 19:37, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:14, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.