Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Response Research Foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gaming Response Research Foundation

Delete. Subject lacks notability and adds no value to the encyclopaedia. Article has been placed by a self-interest group trying to promote a minor local function. Could even be a hoax. --Orrelly Man (talk) 10:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- I'^mperator 13:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 07:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete – I found some significant coverage in an ArsTechnica blog post here, but I cannot find anything else of the same thing that would fully establish notability of this company. MuZemike 07:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:28, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.