Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamemecca

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 02:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gamemecca[edit]

Notability not established or sourced per WP:WEB. RJASE1 ^Talk 15:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that this material does not appear to be something you would find in an encyclopedia. However, the information that was posted in this article is of a great deal of interest to the members of and newcomers to Gamemecca. Most members know little to nothing about the origin of the website and what has happened since it was created, therefore this page was going to serve as an indispensable tool to bolster the site's history. Please do not delete this thread and undo the large edit that took out 1/2 the page I spent a great deal of time on. Caged 15:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The purpose of Gamemecca is not to inform Gamemeccans about it; if you want to do that, I suggest you create your own wiki or make an 'about us' page or something. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 15:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete based on comments above, Caged seems to have severe misconceptions about the purpose of Wikipedia and its articles. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it fails WP:WEB. I do have a novel idea for the contributor, however - if Gamemecca needs a page devoted to the history of the website, how about a history page on the website? It makes far more sense than a Wikipedia article. Arkyan  ^(talk) 18:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. — Kaustuv Chaudhuri 22:29, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable at all. Plasticbottle 05:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per User:Caged - if that's the use intended, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. --User:Krator (t c) 23:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.