Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GameClub

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 06:40, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GameClub

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsurprisingly, I can find no coverage of this Philippines-based video game fansite in reliable sources. No other evidence it meets WP:WEB. Another editor's PROD was contested without comment by the author. Glenfarclas (talk) 04:44, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and salt. No attempt made to demonstrate notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete. Founded in August 2009 and it's already the most popular? Very unlikely. No references. Pcap ping 16:03, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete fails WP:WEB by a mile, the first sentence is especially odious, a sneaky attempt to sound like a claim of notability without actually being one. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:09, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found zero sources. Joe Chill (talk) 20:34, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I already edited it and put reference. Please remove it from deletion.

Majestic27 08:39, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Comment: No, you have a string of links to gameclub.com. Wikipedia:Notability (web) asks whether the site "has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." In other words, has the website been the subject of significant coverage in newspapers, books, magazines, or other reliable sources? (On a different topic, please do not blank this page or remove the AfD template from the article again. Neither will stop this deletion discussion from taking place. Thanks.) Glenfarclas (talk) 08:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.