Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gambling.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gambling.com[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet company notability. While doing the WP:BEFORE, I can say they definitely have a lot of "sources", but not any that I've seen that are significant and can be counted towards organization notability. All of the sources I've seen are press releases, routine announcements, or trivial coverage, none of which meet WP:ORGDEPTH - all the others are not independent. An IP comment on the talk page and editing patterns of the creator also makes this seem like this could be an undisclosed paid editing situation, or at the least, conflict of interest editing. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Whisperjanes (talk) 16:31, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and because textbook UPE. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Well as lack of sources. ~ Junior5a (Talk) Cont 15:29, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: subject lacks independent secondary sources. Jokolis (talk) 11:41, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about the site. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 13:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.