Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galoot (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Galoot

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article which violates WP:NOTDIC - simply lists meanings of the word. Claritas § 20:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

delete only dictionary content so far, unlikely to ever have encyclopedic content. Active Banana ( ^bananaphone 20:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definition + examples of usage = dicdef. If Wiktionary will accept it, the woodworking usage can be added there. Deor (talk) 22:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:52, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a dictionary definition. First Light (talk) 22:14, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a dictionary definition. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 09:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.