Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of religious symbols

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft redirect to the Commons page. Sr 13 07:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery of religious symbols[edit]

The page is a gallery of images which is not the point of encyclopedic articles. This type of page should exist in Commons, which it already does. Jeff3000 20:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - commons is commons. (Alternatively make into an article on religious symbolism)--Doc^g 21:16, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect-- if it already exists in this form in Commons, then redirect. It seems that if someone types in "religious symbols", they should be able to quickly reach the images. I disagree that a gallery of images is "not the point of encyclopedic articles"; the Encyclopedia Britannica often used its color plates for illustrations that led . Everyone of these has a bluelink to an article; not everyone recognizes that the six pointed figure is the "Star of David". I've seen a "triquetra", but never knew what it was called. Does everyone know how to reach the Commons? I didn't. Mandsford 23:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Soft redirect to commons:Religious symbol --24fan24 (talk) 16:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete at the moment, typing "Religious Symbols" links to Religious symbolism, which has a link to the Commons page at the bottom. That seems to be enough for now, surely. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:20, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Soft redirect to commons:Religious symbol makes the most sense here since we have such a gallery at commons. JoshuaZ 15:47, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.