Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galina Misiuriova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 16:35, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Galina Misiuriova[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stats page masquerading as a biography on a tennis player that does not seem to pass WP:NTENNIS or WP:GNG - similar case to Evangelina Olivarez. For the former, Fed Cup is no longer a valid claim to automatic notability and so GNG needs to be met. The article cites this CV but it is unacceptable as a source as it is not independent from Misiurova. The other sources are all stats pages so don't confer notability. No hits in Google News, only stats pages and Wikipedia mirrors in a Lithuanian source search and ProQuest only has passing mentions in results summaries, no actual detailed coverage of Misiurova. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Tennis, and Lithuania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:NTENNIS. Bonoahx (talk) 15:48, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes Wikiproject Tennis Guideline. Has participated in a major international tournament for her nation in Fed Cup. Fyunck(click) (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Per WP:LOCALCONSENSUS, the essay at Wikiproject Tennis cannot be used to support keeping an article that fails WP:GNG. BilledMammal (talk) 09:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis/Article guidelines#Notability is clearly superseded by NTENNIS as the former even says This section contains an essay on notability, consisting of the advice and/or opinions of one or more WikiProjects on how notability may be interpreted within their area of interest. This information is not a formal Wikipedia policy or guideline, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. NTENNIS and GNG should be where we look to first before a WikiProject essay. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And NSPORTS has been challenge and reverted back, so this was a little hasty. Fyunck(click) (talk) 01:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails to pass GNG. Essays that have not been made into Subject Notability Guidelines cannot be used as arguments to keep.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.