Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaia spore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:05, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gaia spore[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As far as I can tell, this term originated with the author of the article in 2007. It does not appear to be used in print, other than sources which copy Wikipedia. Delete as original research. TeaDrinker (talk) 15:16, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 16:56, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete appears to be original research. No Google scholar or seemingly relevant Google books hits. Gaia is a WP:FRINGE issue as well. Barney the barney barney (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Barney the barney barney. -- 101.119.14.211 (talk) 13:56, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Without other evidence does appear as OR. I left additional comment on the article talk page re: Robert Duinker. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.