Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaffers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted by Jimfbleak as nonsense. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 22:56Z

Gaffers

Patent nonsense. Speedy. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 16:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete nn nonsense, vanity?, isn't a gaffer a hollywood term? Mike 16:38, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dont delete its real stuffGaffers11 January

Delete Nonsense. -- (aeropagitica) 17:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nonsense. BTW, Gaffer is indeed a Hollywood term. --Thunk 17:13, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gaffer. Or speedy delete, whatever... Jdcooper 17:19, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, db-nonsense. Tagged. PJM 17:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Gaffer. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 20:37, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under G1. Redirect is fine. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 20:45Z
Speedied, no need to redirect a plural. Gaffer article is fine. Barno 21:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.