Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriella Gutiérrez y Muhs
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Xavexgoem (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gabriella Gutiérrez y Muhs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Dubious notability as an author. ZZArch talk to me 02:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Doesn't seem to pass WP:ANYBIO, WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. Yunshui 雲水 14:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems like an average associate prof with article created by WP:SPA. Papers on Google Scholar with single digit citations. No coverage in major media (reference from Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association)... Tradedia (talk) 20:12, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.