Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriela Salvado

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gabriela Salvado[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverified BLP, tagged for notability. I don't believe the subject is notable: Google News has nothing to deliver, and there is a surprisingly low number of Google hits for a "supermodel". Drmies (talk) 04:51, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 07:19, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete why you nominate Blofeld's article for deletion? is it really that bad, if the subject is not notable we will have to delete sigh...--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 10:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, I just enjoy tickling the evil one every now and then. Drmies (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He has a valid point based on lack of solid sources or indeed that she has done anything notable like model at a global catwalk show or appeared on a notable magazine cover. I started the article on the basis that we didn't have any articles on Guatemalan models. This one's a beauty! There must surely be a single notable model from Guatemala... I think I was under the impression that a listing in the fashion directory site inferred some sort of notability but actually in looking at it again she has no magazine covers listings or anything so is probably not meeting whatever our requirements are for models. Maybe not. I know nothing about fashion but I was sure modelling for Next is something.... But I find it astonishing that there is not a single model from Guatemala who is notable.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:39, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, I agree. And she doesn't seem different (i.e., uglier?) than other models, though none of these are really my type. But even a regular Google search produced next to nothing... Drmies (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not credited with having done anything in the fashion model directory. Not notable. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 18:28, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.