Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabe Scelta
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 03:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Gabe Scelta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:N. I don't think he meets the WP criteria (yet). SIS 23:08, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps should be a stub? —Preceding unsigned comment added by B33k33per (talk • contribs) 23:20, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, yes, but that still doesn't establish notability.
SIS23:25, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps, yes, but that still doesn't establish notability.
- Delete per WP:BIO. --fvw* 23:29, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question has anyone looked up the magazine reference? Is it a feature story or something else? If he's been featured in a notable magazine, I'd say this along with the award-nomination of the book he contributed to is enough to keep. Either by themselves, probably not. JulesH (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't tell you anything bout the magazine. The book appears to be a collection of short stories, edited and compiled by the Daphne in the title. As far as I can tell she got the nomination.
SIS22:26, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]- I would say that when an anthology is nominated for an award, that reflects on _all_ of its contributors as well as its editor. But by itself, certainly not enough to keep the article. JulesH (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't tell you anything bout the magazine. The book appears to be a collection of short stories, edited and compiled by the Daphne in the title. As far as I can tell she got the nomination.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability per guidelines ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. Can't find anything credible third party sources. --Bobak (talk) 19:29, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.