Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabby Bess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:25, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gabby Bess[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not appear to meet the qualifications for notability or significance. While links have been added to the page, they are simply to articles published by the subject on online publications. There does not appear to be appropriate reference to natable reviews that would indicate a high enough level of significance to meet Wikipedia's eligibility. NB: Article originally nominated by Ksoze1 without following proper procedure. This editor has made few or no other edits outside this topic. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 02:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 02:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick ^tc_s 02:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete at best in any case as the current coverage is suggesting of any obvious better notability and improvement. SwisterTwister talk 06:25, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This looks like a mostly self-published writer and has not yet achieved adequate independent notability. Montanabw ^(talk) 00:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.