Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabbie Hanna (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:30, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gabbie Hanna[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bit part actress and presenter, none of the sources bear out any distinct notability. The article also has a rather promotional tone that points to possible COI. Karst (talk) 08:46, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 10:16, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I'm one of the people who worked on improving references for this article. Not only is she notable right now, and passes GNG for significant coverage in multiple RS, I'm going to invoke CRYSTAL in a non-ironic way because she's about to release a book in 3 days which is going to give her even more press. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as the references in the article have been improved and now the subject passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 22:13, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG, I've already done some work in improving the article, and I can assure you I have no conflict of interest with this person. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:51, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging participants from the previous AfD discussion. @Cllgbksr, Shalor (Wiki Ed), Antonioatrylia, and Montanabw: how should the content at User:Savvymcc/Gabbie Hanna be treated? f e minist 13:59, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.