Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G 161-7

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G 161-7[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient notablity per WP:NASTRO. Lithopsian (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Also unsourced. GabeIglesia (talk) 21:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, "G 161-7 is a system of two red dwarf stars." is all it reads. It's not notable. Davidbuddy9 Talk 23:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: there's a paragraph on LHS6167 in Montagnier et al (2006) and in Scholz et al (2005), and a sentence in Reid et al (2002). There may be others, but it's probably not worth the bother. Praemonitus (talk) 19:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I looked at the scholarly sources identified by Praemonitus, but I don't think that the coverage is sufficiently in-depth to fulfill prong 3 of WP:NASTCRIT. As for the remaining three prongs of WP:NASTCRIT, it readily fails each of them. Astro4686 (talk) 23:27, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Appears to lack notability for now. jps (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as there is not enough content out there per WP:RS to show significance of this subject. Maharayamui (talk) 01:27, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.