Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GT85
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:09, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- GT85 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A non-notable product. Wikipedia shouldn't list every type of penetrating oil on the market. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unilease for a similar AfD. Wizard191 (talk) 00:29, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without prejudice as we recently did for Unilease. If there is nothing in the way of non-trivial coverage from reliable third party publications then we should not be hosting this. JBsupreme (talk) 00:49, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Primary sources are not sufficient, no sign of notability. 23:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.