Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GMA Pinoy TV (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:17, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
GMA Pinoy TV[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- GMA Pinoy TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Television station lacks in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Perhaps a redirect to GMA Network might be an WP:ATD? MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: Founded sources for the article: [1] [2] and [3]. ThisIsSeanJ (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep We're not deleting a major international network (with a good American presence) for a large diaspora; it's viewership for Eat Bulaga easily clinches WP:N itself alone. Nate • (chatter) 21:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:NTV and WP:GNG with sources presented by SeanJ. They're reliable and in-depth enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.