Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GBIN
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 01:04, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- GBIN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable per WP:GNG, unreferenced, original research per WP:NOR, can't find a single mention of it online. Prod contested by creator. Top Jim (talk) 14:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. —Top Jim (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. —Top Jim (talk) 14:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per CSD G3. An obvious hoax. Uncle Dick (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll amend my statement above to the effect that if this page is not a hoax, it's a blatant advertisement for a system that is otherwise unknown to the world. Uncle Dick (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete slowly - not notable, but doesn't look like a hoax. Quarl (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- GBIN is not commercial in any way and this no advertisement. GBIN now contains the most published/researched brands (+2600) in the world and the GBIN codes are now offered online www.gbin.info. This independant GBIN number is/ can be used by researchers/analists/brandvaluation firms to exchange and link data and websites about Brand performance, turnover, marketshare, social media activities, advertisement awards etc. The GBIN code is public available and yes it is new. But is that alone a reason to delete this article? You can compare GBIN to EAN which can be used to identify a trade item throughout the value chain. HdG (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.