Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. Pulla Reddy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep vastly improved version, woohoo! Eluchil404 00:35, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

G. Pulla Reddy[edit]

It's advertising. Frekja 18:45, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep Google gets about 75000 hits for "G. Pulla Reddy", which seem to be related to this company. The article definitely needs work, but it seems to be a genuine company of sufficient size to warrent note. WilyD 21:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the first page only 3 of those hits were relevant. ---J.S (t|c) 22:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's not true - Hits 1,2,3,6,7,10+Wiki+Wikiclone in the top ten,11,12,14,16,17,18 ... and so forth all seem to be for this sweets company. There definitely are a lot of google hits for it - as I keep scrolling down randomly through google, I'm finding more hits - seems to be a nontrivial Indian company - I may be being too light on them for fear of furthering the anglocentric bias of Wikipedia - smack me if I amWilyD 03:58, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ewww... brain. Yuck. Err... yeah, delete since this is not a useful stub and there doesn't seem to be any evidence it passes WP:CORP. ---J.S (t|c) 22:14, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's the See's Candies of Hyderabad. The article could be biography of him as well as mention the sweets store. - Ganeshk (talk) 05:52, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the article to be a bio. Please check and reconsider the above votes. - Ganeshk (talk) 06:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As it stands now it seems notable. Not notable in Chicago where I live, not notable in Bejing, but yes, notable in Andhra Pradesh, a state of 75 million people. He has a big business and has a college named after him. In a Wikipedia of 1,000,000+ articles, I think there's a place for this bio. Interlingua ^talk 06:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable and verifiable - entrepreneur. We at WP lag in coverage of business and third-world countries. <Insert cliche here about fighting systemic bias>. On a serious note though, the college was not named after him. It is a private college started by him and his family - not withstanding this, he is still notable. --Gurubrahma 11:39, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above =Nichalp «Talk»= 13:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Gurubrahma. -- Lost 05:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Bharatveer 06:50, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The entry has been vastly improved from when I originally tagged it for deletion. As it stands now, I don't think it needs to be deleted. Frekja 17:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.