Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.D.O. (Stargate)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 23:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G.D.O. (Stargate)

Fancruft, non-notable. Madcoverboy (talk) 21:56, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Wikia:Stargate:Garage Door Opener --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 22:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no out of universe notability --T-rex 05:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Tau'ri technology in Stargate#Garage Door Opener (GDO) (where GDO (Stargate) already redirects). Totally nonnotable. – sgeureka ^t•c 06:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree. Mere fancruft with no encyclopedic potential. Eusebeus (talk) 17:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. written in-universe. Not-notable by itself.Yobmod (talk) 12:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy Delete~~ as a copyvio taken from Stargate Omnipedia which according to their FAQ does not allow for the text of an article to be republished in its entirety. I've tagged it with a speedy tag. -- Whpq (talk) 19:07, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note. I've declined the G12 speedy and fixed the major copyvio issue. Cheers. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 20:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I would say REDIRECT to Tau'ri technology in Stargate#Garage Door Opener (GDO). -- Whpq (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Grey Wanderer | Talk 18:28, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge and redirect without deletion as suggested above there is a clear redirect location. The article is quite new, so I might suggest Wikipedia:Give an article a chance and Wikipedia:Don't demolish the house while it's still being built. In any event, notable and verifiable enough to be kept in some manner. Best, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 05:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Being new is not a reason to keep --T-rex 16:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no merge. For God's sake, it's a random gadget from a TV show, without even the slightest hint of real-notability, impact, or even attention. --Calton | Talk 06:15, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: WP:ITSCRUFT is not a valid reason for deletion. Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 17:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.