Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G.B. "Dip" Lamkin Bridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

G.B. "Dip" Lamkin Bridge

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable bridge, has been in CAT:NN since 2014. I've seen no guideline that declares all 30-ft long bridges notable, and I'd disagree with it if there were one. The one source in the article is a primary source to a government bridge inventory. This piece only mentions the bridge in one sentence. Everything else I'm finding appears to be WP mirrors. Fails WP:GEOFEAT and WP:GNG. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm _Bacon 17:28, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No assertion of notability. This user has created 19 other articles on minor generic road bridges that should also be considered for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 20:41, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For those not familiar with Georgia politics, a few years ago the state government went through a phase where they started slapping names on every bridge, interchange, highway segment and so on, for who knows what reason. It is actually somewhat comical. --Krelnik (talk) 14:04, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:07, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant news coverage. Expertwikiguy (talk) 18:10, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.