Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G&Y

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:56, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

G&Y

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

G&Y (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

can't find any evidence this existed, I'm sure it did, but it is not-notable, was previously prodded in 2016 EchetusXe 14:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Sexuality and gender, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Previously PROD'd so not eligible for a Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

• Delete: Sources provided are all non-independent – clearly this did exist (see archived copy of ref 1 and first external link), but I can't find anything at all online to support a notability claim. I can't see a good redirect based on the article contents either. I wouldn't be particularly surprised if someone was to find print coverage somewhere, but with what's available to me I can't find anything. Tollens (talk) 09:52, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.