Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzzy (composer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:36, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzzy (composer)[edit]

Fuzzy (composer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced biography of a living person which has been in CAT:NN's backlog for 12 years. He existed and had some success, but I couldn't find anything to establish he is notable. Boleyn (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The Danish equivalent article seems to indicate notability - many film and tv music credits, a literature section which Google translates as
  • Nicolas Barbano: Fuzzy and the Film Music, in Live Pictures No. 1, 1980
  • Thomas Vilhelm: The visual ear - the history of film music (Systime, 2005)
  • Brian Christensen, My Roskilde - 10 personalities tell, Roskilde 2011
  • Fuzzy and Tore Leifer, Echoes, Fuzzy's memories of his life as a musician and composer. (Forlaget Klemmerdu, 2019)
It looks as if a fluent Danish speaker could substantially expand this article, and I've tagged it accordingly. The two External Links, his own website and Naxos record company's bio, offer scope for expansion. PamD 15:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As per PamD has many film and TV music credits. Passes WP:GNG. Frigidpolarbear (talk) 16:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as per the reliable sources book coverage that show WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:10, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.