Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuzor (Zoids)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Zoids. Stifle (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fuzor (Zoids)

This fictional topic does not establish notability independent of Zoids through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research, trivial model details, and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, and this is too trivial to require any separate coverage. TTN (talk) 23:01, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not establish notability through significant coverage of real world context in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject. Merging will not result in real world context, so that doesn't solve the problem. Jay32183 (talk) 23:08, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge The various pieces of content in merged article do not have to have real world context, or we could never write a single sentence about plot or characters. The statement refers to our general coverage of fiction in a group of articles or single article about a fiction--there has to be real world context in somewhere, unlike fansite. For material of characters/plot/background sourceable directly from the fiction, primary sources are preferred for plot description. Sop there';s no reason to delete rather than merge. And even if one thought otherwise, there would be no reason against a redirect. DGG (talk) 06:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, X clamation point 04:54, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as per DGG. Edward321 (talk) 00:28, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.