Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futuro Futuro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Futuro Futuro[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no assertion of notability, advert, COI, bad fair use image, SPAM magnet for link from extractor hood article Widefox (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. 02:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 02:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 01:45, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't see what the COI issues are, but the article reads like an advert and has no WP:IRS. It seems to be sourced to a hotch-potch of design websites. I can't see any WP:IRS online, therefore it doesn't seem to meet WP:NCORP criteria. Sionk (talk) 21:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.