Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Futuretimeline.net

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Futuretimeline.net[edit]

Futuretimeline.net (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BEFORE search shows that this fails WP:GNG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:20, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 04:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 04:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk contributions) 04:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: I found a fair number of passing mentions, but I cannot find anything substantial, other than the ZDNet article. ―Susmuffin Talk 04:58, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: most citations are self published and also can't find any significant news coverage. Webmaster862 (talk) 02:41, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.