Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of Korean Metropolitan Subway

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NW (Talk) 15:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Future of Korean Metropolitan Subway

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Little context, overlong articles, no sources, no chance of being sourced. If kept, trim greatly. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 04:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @288 · 05:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL, along with a strong lack of WP:RS. Lithorien (talk) 13:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wow. I didn't get what the future thing is about. Seemed to be a directory of stations on different lines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 18:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom, the purpose of this article seems unclear and lost.--Crossmr (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 02:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 02:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pointlessly repetetive. Each individual rail line has its own article, and any future developments should be covered there. PC78 (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this appears to be a poorly formatted article about ideas for somehow joining existing subway lines in different Korean cities into some sort of national network with the addition of more stations. There are no sources so it is not possible to verify whether this unlikely sounding conglomeration of networks is more than one persons fantasy. Sourced information about officially proposed/planned/under construction stations/extensions/new lines can and should be covered on the article about the individual line. Thryduulf (talk) 13:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future of Korean Railway. Thryduulf (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That article is already part of this nomination. PC78 (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fixed and relisted on today's AfD page as the second article was not previously tagged. PC78 (talk) 19:16, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.