Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Love

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Future Love[edit]

Future Love (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The song did chart, but it was a very low position on a chart that was only around for a couple years. Varsity Fanclub does not seem to be notable, and the Kristinia DeBarge version does not meet WP:NSONGS. Prod declined because deprodder thinks that charting is sufficient. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 22:36, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:32, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. It made Number in a 100 chart - bit like me saying I've done a marathon because I walked a hundred yards. There are 3 references, 2 for Amazon (I shall never understand how a spamlink is a reference) and a confirmation it actually made 100. The rest of the article is unreferenced padding. I would change my vote if more independent references were found - that would establish some kind of notability. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:14, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete didn't chart high enough. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, charted dismally on a bunch of minor charts. Does not otherwise appear to meet WP:MUSIC. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.