Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Future Legend Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Very low activity despite several relists. WP:REFUND applies. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 12:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Future Legend Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable independent label E-Kartoffel (talk) 14:29, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:28, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 15:12, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

the biggest success of this label seems to be the assignment from "Dr. Martens" for the CD . Ca. 60-80% of the music of this label is by Russell Brennan himself, the label owner. Eleanor Rigby was his wife. The article is obviously written by Brennan or someone very close to him. The label's success is exaggerated (mildly expressed). See also the article about the (for wikipedia actually unnotable) Future-Legend-artist Misty Woods. E-Kartoffel (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:48, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a record label with no indications of notability or significance. Lack of sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.