Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Furvert
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Merge with Furry fandom. Deathphoenix ʕ 19:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Furvert[edit]
Furry slang/neologism not notable outside of the world of furries. No reliable sources. It does not justify an article of its own, since Wikipedia is not urbandictionary.com - Motor (talk) 13:00, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything with relevance to Furry fandom. Viridae 12:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep widely-used term, as the article notes it was even used on the show "ER". If so-rare-as-to-be-essentially-nonexistant sexual practices like Cleveland steamer get articles, then (relatively) widespread ones should too. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:10, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, lots of slang words get one mention on a TV show. As for cleveland steamer: WP:INN (that's not policy or a guideline BTW. It's an essay that could do with wider input). Even if you ignore all that, this is basically a dictdef... and one which belongs on urbandictionary. - Motor (talk) 14:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No reliable sources of information on this given/found. Wickethewok 14:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge anything useful to Furry fandom, delete the rest. Wikipedia is not a slang dictionary. --Coredesat 20:35, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Merge to furry fandom and yiff. DyslexicEditor 01:30, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:WINAD and this is a dicdef. Angus McLellan (Talk) 13:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not really important or famous word enough for Wikipedia. I'm pretty happy with the WikiFur entry; whatever facts we have in this article that aren't in WikiFur yet should be merged there. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 11:49, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As it is a useful term used by the furry fandom. ISD 14:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge Belongs in the furry fandom article. Provided the editors can be trusted not to remove it. - 85.210.17.250 00:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment LOL, they wouldn't even allow it in there for an hour. The furvert article even has a debate about some people trying to add pictures to the furvert article and the people who wanted to were banned and their talk pages protected. DyslexicEditor 01:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Furry fandom. Yamaguchi先生 07:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.